Download A Grammar of the Ugaritic Language (Handbook of Oriental by Daniel Sivan PDF

By Daniel Sivan

Ugaritic, chanced on in 1929, is a North-West Semitic language, documented on clay pills (about 1250 texts) and dated from the interval among the 14th and the twelfth centuries B.C.E. The records are of assorted kinds: literary, administrative, lexicological. a number of Ugaritic drugs include parts of a poetic cycle relating the Ugaritic pantheon. one other half, the executive files make clear the association of Ugarit, therefore contributing vastly to our realizing of the heritage and tradition of the biblical and North-West Semitic global. this crucial reference paintings, a revised and translated variation of the author's Hebrew e-book (Beer Sheva, 1993), offers with the phonology, morphology and syntax of Ugaritic. The ebook comprises additionally an appendix with textual content decisions.

Show description

Read Online or Download A Grammar of the Ugaritic Language (Handbook of Oriental Studies Handbuch der Orientalistik) PDF

Similar foreign languages books

Speak Greek with Confidence with Three Audio CDs: A Teach Yourself Guide (TY: Conversation)

Get pleasure from studying the Greek you wish! ultimately an wonderful, non-intimidating method so that you can construct conversing talent! This Greek direction covers 10 key situations--from greetings and purchasing food and drinks to purchasing, inquiring for instructions, and traveling locals--and comprises dialogues in line with subject. the reasons and directions are easy and bite-size, making this a truly available application on your on-the-go way of life.

Storytelling across Japanese Conversational Genre

This publication investigates how jap individuals accommodate to and utilize genre-specific features to make tales tellable, create interpersonal involvement, negotiate accountability, and convey their own selves. The analyses of storytelling in informal dialog, animation narratives, tv speak exhibits, survey interviews, and massive collage lectures specialise in participation/participatory framework, topical coherence, involvement, wisdom, the tale recipient’s position, prosody and nonverbal habit.

The Arabic Verb: Form and meaning in the vowel-lengthening patterns

The Arabic verbal method is, for many grammarians, the keystone of the language. awesome for the regularity of its styles, it provides the linguist with an remarkable chance to discover the Saussurean proposal of the indivisible signal: shape and that means. while Arabic types are well-documented, the elucidation of the corresponding meanings has proved more difficult.

Additional resources for A Grammar of the Ugaritic Language (Handbook of Oriental Studies Handbuch der Orientalistik)

Sample text

E. s. ; cf. discussions inza, pp. e. the yqtl0 forms of verbs with final aleph), viz. 18 IV,24). 'U 3 ' CHAPTER TWO PHONOLOGY General Remarkc The pronunciation of the consonants in Ugaritic is determined by comparison with other Semitic languages (the pronunciation of classical Arabic, Hebrew and its various traditions, and Syriac in its eastern tradition). For several consonants there is no consistency among the Semitic languages and in such cases it is impossible to reach any clear decision regarding the cognate Ugaritic consonants.

This is noted in the discussion of the various dual forms. This page intentionally left blank CHAPTER ONE ORTHOGRAPHY The Ugaritic alphabet contains 30 cuneiform signs which express 27 consonantal phonemes. g. 17). The following are the cuneiform signs according to that order as found in those texts with their equivalents in Latin characters and the accepted diacritical marks below: T i s h UTf S U E w r ~ 9 - f d ~ h TTT "Iw 1 m _ d n z ht I(: Y C s 1. Scholars have long since noted the resemblance and the differences between the order of the letters in the Ugaritic and the Hebrew alphabets (cf.

G. 123,22; cf. Grondahl 1967:22). In these instances there may be a case of dissimilation, that is, the consonant p differentiated from the following voiceless consonant (s, h or t ) and became voiced. 4 V,32). It is hard to explain the first form as a scribal error because the signs for mem and lamed are so dissimilar (cf. Albright 1950a:387; Fronzaroli 195557). 1 19,3) it may be that in the first word there is a dissimilation from *b bt (cf. Ug 7, p. 31). 11,5 and elsewhere) can be compared to Biblical Hebrew Pug.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.72 of 5 – based on 31 votes